.
Text:
Buogiorno at all. Berlusconi does not know about you but I see it wrong, it hurt because I had promised last week that Mubarak was a wise man, and then it was good that stays in place, was overwhelmed by the protests, a clear sign that the protests are used to send home the tyrants and now, the latest news, Mubarak seems to be even in a coma, the evidence of what he said Andreotti The Power wears out those who did not have it, or who loses, who did not have it anymore.
All processes Berlusconi
But we have a Premier politically in a coma before being sent home, but in a coma, politically speaking, what happened Sunday in the streets, in more than 200 centers in Italy that was reminiscent happened in the two V-Day but then designed to minimize the press because they were not involved or the institutional right, nor the institutional left, only citizens were involved, and then pretended not to see how many people there, there were several, more or less that which yesterday filled the squares of women and not just women.
shared this event yesterday with the V-Day has also completely autonomous self-organization and indicates a desire of its people to go to the streets to give enough and this is mainly for Italy's image internationally because now after 17 years abroad were coming taken for a ride because we had Berlusconi as our representative, or rents his worthy opponents, now they take abroad per il culo gli italiani perché si tengono Berlusconi, quindi l’attenzione è passata dalla sua persona alla connivenza, all’insensibilità degli italiani, per cui ci si dice: ma possibile che si ribella tutto il Maghreb, l’Italia che ha uno che non ha niente a che fare, che ha uno che non ha niente che invidiare a Mubarak, anzi per certi versi ha uno molto peggio di Mubarak non fa niente, il fatto che si veda una ribellione spontanea di centinaia di migliaia di persone, è molto interessante e è molto importante perché finalmente il mondo vede che anche in Italia c’è una reazione.
Il fatto poi che le piazze fossero piene soprattutto di donne, credo che abbia dato ancora più fastidio a Berlusconi, the fact that today's gave out crazy, said people were manifestations of sectarian as if the events were to be partial, it is clear that when it occurs, occurs for something or against something or someone or against someone else, so it is in itself, is inre ipsa faction of the event, God forbid that they wanted to impose even contradictory in street demonstrations as they are trying to impose it in the few television programs of study not yet controlled by the nano, and then the fact that there were, especially women in the square, I think he has given much trouble for Berlusconi, who is believed to be the most loved by Italians, but above from Italian and then to be the only possible representative, indeed he is not satisfied with the representative, the idol, the name of protecting, guiding spirit of women and this has surely ruined the weekend, days before him that ruined Napolitano even a mild conservative sleepy Napolitano, seems to have broken the boxes and virtually the last meeting at the Quirinale said facts trial, if you are innocent you will be acquitted, the problem is that Berlusconi has the suspect not to be innocent and then was released rather grim-faced, because Napolitano said that the dissolution of power is his, although Berlusconi gives an interpretation most particularly, that Napolitano may dissolve the Chamber only if Berlusconi agrees, of course, that if he has invented in its Constitution imaginary ad personam, which fortunately is not written anywhere.
Then there's more annoyed at the fact that within a few days to share its processes that are 3, plus the fourth of which is expected to horas, probably tomorrow, Tuesday, the GIP response from the appropriate ritual immediate Ruby and in two days, probably Wednesday, the Court of Appeal of Milan will issue a decision on the case Mondadori, there we are forgotten, but perhaps what is most terrifying because Berlusconi is talking about money, conquibus, di pecunia, in Parlamento grado il Giudice Mesiano, quello linciato degli house-organ berlusconiani perché non gli importa niente, poco di meno che dei calzini turchesi, aveva condannato la Fininvest di Berlusconi a risarcire la CIR di De Benedetti con 750 milioni di Euro, una cifra inimmaginabile, a pensarla tutta insieme per avere a suo tempo sottratto la casa editrice Mondadori a De Benedetti, grazie alla compravendita della sentenza della Corte d’Appello di Roma con le tangenti al giudice Vittorio Metta.
I legali di Berlusconi ottennero la sospensiva di quel pagamento, chiunque abbia avuto una causa civile l’abbia persa, sa che quando uno perde una causa civile in primo grado, paga subito, perché la sentenza è immediatamente Executive and then makes an appeal and if he was right, even the Supreme Court who has received money to restore them to him back with interest.
Berlusconi almost unique case in history, was able to obtain a suspension of quell'immediata enforceability of the decision at first instance, so had to pull out a penny, but now may have to drive the grain because the Court of Appeal of Milan is called to confirm or correct or overrule the decision of the Civil Court and then Berlusconi knows that they have the Mondadori frigate with a sentence for having bought by his lawyers with his money, so it knows that, unless the judges start to buy, which is rather difficult, especially in Milan, it is very likely that a substantial compensation even though maybe not as high as what was approved at first instance, the touch and this of course would cause dramatic impact on stock quotes of his companies, and of course pockets his and his companies.
Then there are the processes, rejected the cause for such failure, Berlusconi can not declare him for a year and a half for anyone because there always has to be done for the government and the Constitutional Court ruled that a case-time time the court will consider these grounds, he can get by all the obstacles he wants, but it will not be automatic courts should take them for good without a murmur, and then of course you'll see sitting at the hearing if the grounds are considered to be real and will be deemed legal if they are not real or will not be legitimate, he can not go to hearings, but the judges are not obliged to suspend and return them so that they can prosecute even if there is, therefore, have refixed the reopening of the processes that are well known, that the funds for the purchase and sale of television rights for blacks from America to Italy via triangulation with companies offshore which enabled each step an accumulation of funds that blacks swelled the cost of purchased movies, so when you arrive at the final box e cioè all’acquisto da parte delle sue società televisive, il film valeva il doppio, il triplo, il decuplo di quello che era il suo valore iniziale al momento del primo acquisto da parte della prima società offshore, dato che le società offshore fanno tutte parte del gruppo Berlusconi, ecco che scatta l’accusa di frode fiscale mentre c’erano anche appropriazioni indebite, falsi in bilancio che però sono già andati in prescrizione grazie anche alle leggi che ha fatto lui sulla prescrizione e sul falso in bilancio, restano dunque in piedi le accuse di frode fiscali e il processo sui diritti Tv – Mediaset riparte il 28 febbraio , tra pochissimi giorni.
Secondo processo Mediatrade, lì è accusato di embezzlement and tax fraud itself, the mechanism is identical to what I just described, except that the company was founded in recent years Mediatrade replacing another, and then the process continues on the Rights of Mediaset in another process for the rights Mediatrade, change just the company but the mechanism, the allegations etc. are the same, about more recent times, the process Mediatrade and then while the process may Mediaset prescription next year, the process Mediatrade no time to do it, I think until 2014/2015, so it could reach its natural conclusion in the first blade of Cassation without prescription. Finally, the Mills
process that has already concluso per l’Avvocato Mills con la condanna in primo e secondo grado e la prescrizione per pochi giorni in Cassazione ma con l’accertamento del reato, tant’è che Mills è stato costretto a pagare i danni alla Presidenza del Consiglio, per Berlusconi rimase sospeso prima per il Lodo Alfano, poi per il legittimo impedimento, adesso riprende l’accusa ovviamente è la stessa anche per Mills, quest’ultimo era accusato di essere stato corrotto da Berlusconi per fare delle false testimonianze e salvarlo in alcuni processi, Berlusconi è accusato di averlo corrotto con 600 mila dollari in Svizzera nel 1999, questo processo riparte il 12 marzo, corruzione giudiziaria del testimone, quindi 28 febbraio processo Mediaset, 5 March Mediatrade process in a preliminary hearing March 12, Mills trial, so each week a part of it.
Then there is the case with Ruby, the Ruby case, I said, the GIP Cristina Di Censo is compulsive for some days, less than a week the cards sent by the prosecution, are 782 pages in addition to those that were already been sent to Parliament, and had 616 of those sent to Parliament by the prosecution because the prosecutor asked the concerned to be able to search the offices of the Rag. Spinelli instead had opposed the parliamentary immunity, claiming to live in a residence covered by immunity as reporting directly to the President of the Council of Ministers Silvio Berlusconi.
Posts Mafia
But this time, the maps of the Prosecutor does not serve to prove the necessity of that search, serve to demonstrate the evidence of the trial against Silvio Berlusconi, who is a prerequisite to obtain the immediate and the ritual that GIP the immediate mention of Berlusconi to trial before the court, skipping across the stage very long, tiring of the preliminary hearing, the deposit of atti.Il which means that if tomorrow the GIP Di Censo decide, as prosecutors sought the indictment for a rite immediate Berlusconi in a couple of months, to April, these are the average times of the Court of Milan for the immediate judgments, would find in court for the first day of the trial that the defendant would for extortion against the police led to commit an improper act, namely the release of Ruby in the hands of Nicole Minetti contrary to the orders of the PM that Fiorillo had instead placed in or delegating a community service or detention of the girl to stop theft to the police station waiting to be assigned to community crime and the other is the facilitation of child prostitution in order to have, Berlusconi, allegedly had sex with a minor and have then sought to hide all this with the hasty phone call to the Police, just to avoid Ruby, held for hours in there, could raccontare la natura dei suoi rapporti con Berlusconi, quindi la concussione commessa per seppellire le prove dell’altro reato, la prostituzione minorile.
Quindi se il G.I.P. decide ok per il rito immediato, a aprile comincia il processo a Berlusconi per concussione e prostituzione minorile, processo che poi si svolge davanti al Tribunale normalmente con l’accusa, la difesa, i testimoni da una parte, i testimoni dall’altra, presto, velocemente, subito. A fine settimana invece la Procura chiuderà le indagini nei confronti di Emilio Fede, di Nicole Minetti e Lele Mora accusati di sfruttamento della prostituzione e quindi stralciati rispetto a Berlusconi, perché? Perché per loro le indagini sono cominciate prima, non si has had time to ask the ritual that should be asked immediately within 3 months after inclusion in the register of suspects, these people being investigated since last summer, clearly have gone well over 3 months and then they follow the ordinary procedure, then for them the process will take a bit 'more because there will be a request to send to trial, the filing of documents and then request the case to trial with the ordinary and then come after, even if it is possible that in the meantime, Berlusconi will succeed to slow down its process in the end, as we will see a note with the jurisdictional dispute.
So we said part of the process Mediaset February 28, March 5 part of the process Mediatrade, il 12 marzo parte il processo Mills e poi a aprile, se il G.I.P. opta per il rito immediato, parte il processo Berlusconi – Ruby, Ruby vittima e Berlusconi imputato, se invece il G.I.P. respinge il rito immediato ritenendo che la prova non è evidente, come sostiene la Procura, allora anche per Berlusconi ci sarà il rito ordinario e quindi i magistrati che ormai hanno chiuso le indagini, depositeranno gli atti alle parti e passate alcune settimane con le richieste delle difese di altri atti di altre indagini etc., chiederanno verosimilmente il rinvio a giudizio come faranno per Fede, Minetti e Mora che in quel caso verrebbero riaccorpati con Berlusconi e quindi si terrà il processo a tutti e 4 anche se con diverse accuse.
Cosa sta Berlusconi trying to do? Berlusconi is desperate for? Why even show off in recent weeks when it was very quiet these messages in video, or heard these interviews without the Tg1 where it seems that even give him the answers before they ask questions because they are video messages interspersed with a trembling man who puts on some fake question, he sliced \u200b\u200bwide security for she said, are in a barrel of iron, there is no evidence, the crime does not exist, say that victims of extortion were not extorted, said the underage girl who told me to be an adult, so there is no crime then the jurisdiction of the Court of Ministers, the said Parliament, which is very quiet, nothing happens, let's move on etc.. In fact we saw that it was all a bluff painful, or perhaps its lawyers are not well informed of the situation, so that there is no need for victims of concussion say that they were extorted because extortioner is convicted, the important thing is to prove the bribery, if he is so in awe of the extorted from its extortioner to deny even have came under pressure, who cares, the important thing is show the pressure, we do not allow the ignorance in the case of a process for child prostitution, if one does not know that the girl was underage, worse for him, had to ask, you at least know the names and ages of those with whom you go to bed, if you do not know you face this risk, of course, otherwise the crime of child prostitution would never be prosecuted, why? Because all the defendants would say, "Your Honor, I believed that she had 60 years, he looks 70, but had 14" it is clear that we can not defend well in a trial because the judge rightly be based simply on the evidence that when in which the sexual act would have been the girl is under age and then been paid, these are the two requirements of child prostitution. But above all Berlusconi
or was not informed or did not understand, or wanted to tell some other dances, had boasted of being able to block the process by voting in the House which stated that the Public Prosecutor in Milan and the Milan court lacked jurisdiction because they have to send everything to the Court of Ministers, say that the House vote, as well as an abuse of power was mainly a message against the Mafia magistrates to say, we will launch a warning, you see a little 'if you want to obey you, though you would not be required to do so, or if want to spoil your life, career, because it starts pounding, but this was the only value was purely symbolic, no court shall adhere to that drawing Chamber territorial or functional jurisdiction of a crime, then that too was an unloaded gun, fired it and nothing happened, the process remained in the hands of prosecutors in Milan who has duly filed his acts before the Court of GIP Milan, the Tribunal for crimes ministry was not involved in any way, why? For as we have already explained many times, the concussion to the Police it is doubtful whether there was or was not there, but certainly there is no doubt that he was an ordinary crime, in that it does not exist between the functions of the President of the Council to order the police headquarters and retain those who will be awarded, or how, can not abuse of functions to be what happened, if anything, is an abuse of power, abuse of acting Prime Minister, I am the President of the Council and command you to do something which is not in my possession order is not in my ability to sort and this is not a crime and therefore should not be ministerial to the Court of Ministers, but now we say Berlusconi will make a war against the powers of the Court of Milan, against the GIP should they decide to send him to be competent for trial immediately before the Constitutional Court, a state power to another power of the state complaint accusing him of violating the rights of the former, then this conflict of powers between the powers of the State, must be resolved by the Constitutional Court must decide, provided that the GIP determines that: I am competent and not the Court of Ministers, if the GIP has abused its powers and violating the encroaching power of politics or whether that simply done its job as stated in the Constitution.
This conflict of jurisdiction between state powers, the Chamber is ready to vote for one minute after the GIP has ruled on the request for immediate ritual, and so we have already made it clear that the investigating judge of the Census has guns pointed on me, because if he wants to live peacefully or denies the Milan prosecutor's office immediately the rite, or is declared incompetent and even tells the Procura di Milano mandate tutto al Tribunale dei Ministri così viviamo sereni e tranquilli, anche se la legge e la Costituzione prevedono esattamente il contrario, è un altro messaggio mafioso questo del conflitto di attribuzione, perché? Perché non ha nessuna influenza sul processo Berlusconi – Ruby in quanto non basta fare un conflitto di attribuzioni tra i poteri dello Stato contro il tuo giudice per bloccare il tuo processo, il processo va avanti e il giudice si deve fermare solo un minuto prima della sentenza, quindi può celebrare tutto il dibattimento di primo grado e se nel frattempo la consulta non è ancora intervenuta a risolvere il conflitto di attribuzioni , a quel momento sì, a quel momento i giudici, il Tribunale prima entering the Council Chamber must wait for the Court to determine whether they were competent or had jurisdiction, the Court of Ministers, there is precedent, the precedent that unites our entire political class, the Prodi government and the Berlusconi government have raised 3 conflict-of assignments against judges in Milan who were processing the Italian and American spies, charged for the kidnapping of Abu Omar, accusing them of not being not competent, but accusing them, this had to be the Prodi government, is the Berlusconi government of violating The secret was using some papers seized in the offices of the Earthquakes that the government had decided to cover with state secrets.
The judges said, no, not covered by State secret and not even if they were covered by state secrecy we do not need to judge, I condemn that because then they were all judged guilty, even though Americans were also punished and The Italians no, thanks to the parachute that had provided the governments of the center-right and center-left, no, we do not need to prove the guilt those documents, we can do without, 3 jurisdictional disputes that have blocked the process, Abu Omar, until the eve of above, when you get to the decision the judges expect that the Court's know and when did the Court said that a decision very strange, very Paraculo, it seems not in legal terms, there was a matter of state secret and some cards could not be used etc., the courts have also drawn conclusions, saying we do not agree but we are not obliged to declare punishable guilty but not punishable because of state secrets, the defendants Italian of that business internationally, the same thing would happen if you opened the ceremony immediately after Berlusconi to Berlusconi and his compulsion to raise this most famous of conflicting powers, the process would continue as if nothing had happened at least a year, a year and a half, how likely would last, one defendant, not many witnesses are dozens of girls, whores, escort, witnesses who are unaware of what was happening that left him with wide eyes and you know what you read in the newspapers.
Berlusconi is in a minority
So even the conflict of powers between the branches of government is another gun Gun which also said it is not even able to shoot, because how do you explain what happens in parliamentary circles? What happens is that Berlusconi's lawyers that is Ghedini, Longo and do not know what others have to write to the Speaker of the House, just because it touches Fini Berlusconi and Fini is deputy must request an opinion on the conflict of powers to the Board for permission to proceed, The Board is there a center-right majority, then the PDL League and then Berlusconi Government in there has nothing to fear and we have seen with the case in search of Spinelli, but if the council and is likely to do so, carry out the order of Berlusconi and that is to say yes to the conflict of powers between the Chamber and the Court of Milan, there will still be the last word of the Bureau of the Chamber and the latter is composed of 19 members and there PDL and the League, including most so-called leaders, those of recent acquisition by Berlusconi's party, even counting the elected representative who will soon come to rebalance and commissions, including the representative of the center-right leaders, the majority current would be less because the office of President of the Chamber would lead to the 9 votes of the PDL League more than 10 leaders of the opposition and that is, PD, Di Pietro Fini Casini and then the Bureau may deny a favorable opinion of the war powers then that would not even discussed the classroom and then it is likely that this gun, to the prejudice, I can not even fire blanks, due to the fact that they lack the numbers in the office of President of the Chamber.
So what they're trying to do? They are trying to change a lot of laws, some ordinary and some constitutional, but we see them quickly in succession that they want to change these laws, even if we can change those numbers with miserable that has a majority in Parliament, particularly in the House, however, would not be able to read any of these to stop the process immediately, provided that GIP possessed the future, against Berlusconi and therefore these laws are or scupper the other processes that are sharing, or to send messages to the mafia magistrates, to say you want to persist in Berlusconi trial? We wrecked all, this is a classic of racketeering, extortion is political, parliamentary and is not the first time you use it, though some judges insist on a powerful process, the friends of the powerful wrecked the whole system giudiziario dal punto di vista processuale e addirittura dal punto di vista costituzionale.
Intanto fanno ripartire il processo breve, cos’è? E’ il processo che dura esattamente quello che dura oggi, con la differenza che si estingue ogni volta che compie 6,5 anni, quindi in un paese dove i processi durano dagli 8 ai 12 anni in media nella fase ovviamente indagini preliminari, udienza preliminare, primo grado, appello e Cassazione, arrivati al sesto anno e mezzo muoiono, si estinguono, quindi una gigantesca amnistia per tutti i processi che si celebrano in Italia, è quella legge talmente spaventosa che aveva spaventato addirittura il centro-destra se dopo averla approvata al Senato dove c’è Schifani che fa passare qualunque cosa, alla Camera il centro-destra grazie soprattutto ai finiani, l’aveva bloccata e Napolitano si era pubblicamente felicitato del fatto che non fosse passato il processo breve e adesso lo vogliono riattizzare approvandolo anche alla Camera ma in una versione diversa da quella che era passata al Senato, quindi comunque dovrebbe ripassare un’altra volta al Senato.
Vogliono evitare l’effetto amnistia più scandaloso e cioè vogliono cancellare la norma transitoria che applicava questa regola anche ai processi già iniziati, per cui tutti i processi già iniziati se sono in Tribunale da più di due anni e mezzo o se sono in appello da più di un anno e mezzo o se sono in Cassazione da più di due anni, morirebbero all’istante, whether the rule applies to projects already begun, because the rule states that the process should last 6.5 years in total, but then sets internal deadlines for each of the three sets of proceedings.
was the rule, designed on purpose to scupper Berlusconi processes, especially the two offenses relating to the oldest, Mediaset and Mills that are prescribed, remember, Mills next year, Mediaset in two years, then could no longer do otherwise would be a transitional rule carries off hundreds of thousands of trials and the risk for Napolitano, Berlusconi did not sign it to him, they want to do the job for only about new processes, for processes that have not yet arrived at the Court, al rinvio a giudizio e allora voi direte: a cosa serve una legge sul processo breve se non si applica ai processi già iniziati? Se non si applica ai processi di Berlusconi? Hanno pensato naturalmente anche a questo e quindi nel processo breve hanno infilato una norma che stabilisce che chi è incensurato ha diritto a una prescrizione breve, Berlusconi sembra incredibile ma è incensurato, perché è incensurato? Perché ha sempre ottenuto prescrizioni e quindi cosa fanno? Gli regalalo delle altre prescrizioni così resterà sempre incensurato, saranno una serie di sentenze spaventose che dicono: è colpevole, ma è prescritto il reato quindi è incensurato, è un incensurato seriale praticamente, riducendo ulteriormente la prescrizione che già era stata ridotta con la legge ex Cirielli, riuscirebbero così a fulminare i processi a Berlusconi, qual è il problema? E’ che fulminerebbero tutti i processi agli imputati incensurati, ovviamente, gli imputati incensurati non è che sono imputati onesti, sono semplicemente imputati che non hanno mai avuto condanne e che quindi stanno per averne una, con questa legge non avrebbero neanche quell’una e continuerebbero a essere incensurati ma anche rapinatori, estorsori, stupratori e cose di questo genere, processo breve quindi, quanto tempo occorre? Intanto devono approvarlo alla Camera, con quei due voti di maggioranza che si ritrovano, poi devono tornare al Senato, campa cavallo.
Intercettazioni, they want to resume the law on wiretapping that had the same outcome of the trial brief with the difference that there the Finian and Napolitano had stopped but the Senate, while one of the two Houses of Parliament in the House, I believe, had already approved another law is devastating, of course, Napolitano had boasted in public, do you remember this summer when he said what happened to the law on the process and short on wiretapping? We locked, you have seen, this is not true that I'm here to comb the dolls, we'll see if now sign a law that had publicly boasted of having locked no later than last summer, but even that Berlusconi processes for Ruby, Mediaset, Mediatrade and Mills are useless, because the existing processes are not based on interceptions, the process is based on Ruby interceptions but concern phone calls between defendants normal phone where the voice appears to Berlusconi 5 have been intercepted, were not even transcribed because the prosecutor considers unnecessary, irrelevant and in fact were not even sent to the House for the necessary permission to use them against him, therefore all interceptions ... they will say, but the law on wiretapping also includes a gag on the press for ban on advertising, but has already been published now, because the genius of blocking the search Ghedini the Rag. Spinelli, has forced the prosecutor to send the case to the House and then from there everything came out.
All to save
So even the law on wiretapping would have no reflection on the processes taking place in Berlusconi, want to make a law to punish the magistrate who has interceptions useless, but who decides whether the intercepts are useless, since the PM asks permission to make the interception and GIP GIP says flaws, if we are useless, of course, know that after the judges, when they discover that nothing comes out, but before doing so no judge can know that Interceptions are useless, so it's another law made simply, is a law because it Scarecrow? Why no interception will reveal never useless, it will never prove that a judge has ordered an interception useless, at least that has not already include gifts of divination and what comes out of the wiretaps and what not comes out of the interceptions.
They want to make another law, message Mafia, civil liability of judges, the judge who will pay for mistakes of his own pocket, this is unconstitutional because it? Because there is already a law that allows the State to claim the magistrate erred by intent or gross negligence, in all contracts of employment it is written that if the employee or the employee of a company commits a willful or gross negligence, why did it wrong on purpose or wrong because he has not taken the necessary precautions should be taken to avoid mistakes, he answered him and not the company, this course at the end of a trial.
The judge who errs in good faith, investigations convince him that he was the guy to commit a crime and then it turns out instead to be a turncoat who was perhaps another, there is no mica intent or gross negligence, if any Whenever a judge sentencing someone and then in the higher grade that someone is acquitted, the judge had earlier ordered to be paid, the courts did not condemn any more, so you do not fulfill all no one complains and we have crime that is spreading more than a spill today, why? Why anyone would take more responsibility says, and if you acquit him than me, I have to pay me? So I might as well carry it out, and so no one will sue me, it is obviously absurd, do not process more than anyone every time a court conviction, should be afraid of his own pocket to pay, the judge should only obey the law and his conscience, certainly not this kind of intimidation.
want to go back to parliamentary immunity, and here we are ridiculous, because to return to the old Article 68 of the Constitution with the authority to act on any investigation of any Member, you must change the constitution as it was changed when it was abolished in 1993 the authorization to proceed, to change the Constitution imagine what a long time are required, we he wants the House vote, the vote in the Senate, again voting in the House, then back to the Senate vote, always on the same text that should not change even a comma, and then if you have not reached the 2 / 3 of Parliament and they have two votes, more than 2 / 3, the more room there is a referendum, imagine a country in Saving Silverman against caste as ours, with people who do not have the time go to the streets against everything and everyone, quite a referendum to say yes or no immunity for politicians, but would be swept away, probably the immunity would be abrogated with a higher number of votes that repealing the 1993 public financing of parties, then it is clear that the immunity did not get anything, they will never do it and above all time-so long that it would not stop certain processes that begin tomorrow.
The reform of the CSM, the CSM want to reform, separate careers, separate the CSM, they are all rubbish, of course, but even these require a constitutional law and then horse bell, the process starts now, then even separating the career is that you block processes, and Berlusconi knows that none of these brilliant ideas put together by his brilliant staff and lawyers, will be able to block these processes that then go ahead and mark what happens in the next few months is that we go to vote or not you go to vote.
If you go to vote will be a party because there will be a part of the campaign and the other the parade of whores to the Court of Milan, telling us the nights of Berlusconi, and then explain why then he must deal with day to bury what he did at night because our Prime Minister will tell us how it is blackmailed by these ladies, we'll see what happens tomorrow with the decision of the GIP, we'll see what happens tomorrow for the forthcoming ruling Mondadori and if necessary we'll talk next Monday.
meantime I want to point out a DVD, it's a job that I believe there may be of interest and pleasure, is a work counter, "July 19, 1992 a massacre of the state" if they are occupied and Marco Salvatore Borsellino Canestrari, who is here in front to me and every Monday is to collect the mouth, there is evidence in addition to the undersigned by Antonio Ingroia, Salvatore Borsellino, Nino Di Matteo, Richard Jenkins, Nicole Biondo, Umberto Lucentini, Pepper White and readings Claudio Joey 's actor who reads the diary of Manfred Borsellino, the son of Judge Borsellino Borsellino is the story of a very unusual story, as you will see and it is mainly the story about the background of the massacre in Via D'Amelio, is the worthy completion of that other DVD "in check" that We had car produced with the daily by Udo Gumpel and Marco Lillo and we distributed, but those who seek it can still be found on the website of The Daily Done, this will be out on newsstands from mid-February and will also be purchased from the Without site of The Daily, July 19, 1992 "A massacre of State," whereas those who want the entire collection of word of mouth and the last two years of Word of mouth is the Blog Grillo box that we reported last week, good week and spread the word!
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment